Tuesday, June 14, 2016

WADESON WADES IN

The infamous Wadeson wades into our local issues. Always easy to do this from afar. Lecturing us on the truth when he hid the truth from us about himself for ten years while he sucked off our archdiocese and pretended to the position of "formator" at RMS all the while living in San Francisco with his precious neocats. And who knows where he is today.

What a great opportunity to tell the truth - once again - about Wadeson. Here it is. Go here for more of who Wadeson is.


8 comments:

  1. Ahhhh the priest accused of sexual abuse counsels the archbishop accused of sexual abuse. No wonder they were so close and Apuron protected him. They have so much in common.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is then this perspective on Chesterton from the review of his "Utopia of Usurers" by Dr. Peter Chojnowski.

    “…anger, tinged with wrath, an anger that is not artificial, but, rather, spontaneous, is another deep wellspring of truth. It is the gushing forth of that which is meant to cleanse or to sweep away. Such a manifestation of wrath, rarely tied to self-interest or petty ambition, is the most honest account of what a man is, a revelation of his inner capacity for nobility and heroism. Of course, the appearance of anger on an occasion when some great good is sullied or threatened is truly a sign that there has been a great patience at work in the mind of the man of wrath. He has borne with that which he finds intolerable. He only “strikes out” when he, from the deepest recesses of his being, knows that the good, if not defended now, will be damaged irreparably. The man of righteous anger will not see the idiocy of evil and error stand triumphant over the fallen body of the True, the Good, and the Beautiful.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow! Thank you, Jeni. I needed to read that just now.

      Delete
    2. Contrasts ill perceived righteous anger from unrighteous anger đŸ‘đŸ»

      Delete
  3. If Wadeson was innocent then Why did he threaten to sue? Then he fled to SF the Gay Capital of the USA. No disrespect to gays, but this guy is a Priest? He is not suppose to have sexual intercourse. just saying

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wadeson you are a joke. Please we do not want to here your 2 cents about Guam. After all you have done to hide in the shadows of the Neo's and RMS.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Butt buddies for sure, for sure!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes Jeni, thank you, for many reasons, for sharing that.

    ReplyDelete