Hon retracts Apuron statements, says church should assume any abuse allegation is serious
Former altar boys say lawsuit moving forward despite retraction
Haidee V Eugenio, Pacific Daily News11:46 p.m. ChST July 27, 2016Archbishop Savio Hon Tai Fai on Wednesday said he is deeply troubled by the sexual abuse allegations brought against Archbishop Anthony Apuron, and he has retracted past statements issued by Apuron and the Archdiocese of Agana which accused Apuron's accusers of lying. Read more.
It's only right that the lawsuits move forward. It's easy for Hon to apologize for someone else; after all, Hon did not commit the crime(s). Let the guilty parties have their day in court! Including Udovaldo and Dakon Tenorio.
ReplyDeleteHon, congratulations! you have shown where your expertise lies. You speak like a born politician. In other words, as the American Indians would say, "you speak with forked tongue!" One example: you say you don't exactly know where apuron is. Yeah, you don't know if he is in the living room or in the kitchen. So you can face us and say you don't know exactly where he is. But, Hon, in your position, are you not informed where your priests are? Or, if not, can you not find out?
ReplyDeleteHon really thinks we're stupid. I was thinking the same thing when the word "exactly" was used.
DeleteHon, you sneaky devil, you. Stop playing games Hon!
Hon knows exactly where Apuron is at, He chooses to dodge the question, I'm surprised that the press folks did not press the question on Hon. Just another example of Hon's insincerety, he cannot be trusted if he continues to lie through his teeth. Where is the Vatican hiding Apuron?
DeleteBut stop whit this carnival!
ReplyDeleteThe key phrase in today's news is "Hon retracts..." Is it time to retract Hon?
ReplyDeleteOops! Misspelled my own name.
DeleteThat's OK. Your name is difficult to spell :)
DeleteLOL Bob...Hon is so calculating and insincere. What is up with Rome! With all the strings attached he should be easy enough to retract.
ReplyDeleteIs it time to start using THAT sign, Bruce?
ReplyDelete