Wednesday, February 3, 2016

DAVID THE VG: NOW YOU SEE IT, NOW YOU DON'T - PART 3

Continued from Part 2

Before we move on to the more egregious and despicable elements of this story (tampering with a public record is illegal), let us examine even more evidence that the issuance of the certificate of title without the memorial showing the Declaration of Deed Restriction and its subsequent publication in the U Matuna could NOT possibly have been an oversight. 




In the same April 2015, U Matuna story bragging about the findings of the Lewis Roca law firm, Apuron references a title report obtained from a local title company, Pacific American Title:

The footnote [1] is significant. Here's what it references:


This was a LIE. The minute we sent someone to the Chancery to "consult the whole document," it was withdrawn from public view. 

Here's why:

In a copy of the Pacific American Title Report which we obtained separately, there is this:

Now, do you see why Apuron and his crooks did NOT want you to see the "whole document?" The "ownership" of said property is "SUBJECT TO the interest of RMS." And what is this "interest?" The rest of the sentence answers that question:"in perpetual use of a see of RMS."

A "see" is an ecclesial jurisdiction, such as the Apostolic See or the See of the Archdiocese of Agana. Notice that in the language of the Declaration of Deed Restriction, Apuron clearly recognizes that RMS is a "see," an ecclesial jurisdiction, distinct from the Archdiocese of Agana. And he is "subjecting" the entire property FOREVER (perpetual use) to the control of that separate "see," which, other than being only one vote on both boards, he has no control, even though he is the sole incorporator. 

(By the way, you may also want to note that the title report references Apuron as "grantor," whereas the Declaration itself only references him as the owner. This means that the title company recognized that the Declaration effectively conveyed - "granted" - property from one entity to another. But we'll come back to that.)

Title reports do not interpret the effect of deeds, liens, and encumbrances. They simply report them. The effect of a deed, lien, encumbrance or any instrument impacting title to real property is, when contested, something that would have to be legally determined. 

Not having yet withstood a legal scrutiny, Apuron was able to declare that, as per PATICO's report, "ownership" of the subject property given that his name was still on the title. But he DID NOT WANT YOU TO SEE item 7 just as he never wanted you to see the The Declaration itself - which is why it lay undiscovered for four years after it was recorded. And as per David's publication of the certificate of title WITHOUT the said Declaration of Deed Restriction, he still does not want you to see it. 

Sadly, David's little scheme worked....almost. Many people, not understanding that a certificate of title does not actually mean ownership of a property (the way it does a car), bought the lie that David the VG fed them on November 29, 2015. I say "almost" because....of what IS to come. (David, did you call Jackie yet?)

I wouldn't doubt, given the absolute criminality of the publication of a false, if not intentionally falsified, public document, that David's instructions came directly via the filthy Gennarini-Pius sewer. 

But first they had to obtain a copy of the certificate of title, signed by the registrar (and signed recently) that did NOT include a memorial for the Declaration of Deed Restriction recorded on November 22, 2011. 

How did they do that? Jackie? Do you know?

Hmmmmmmm.

8 comments:

  1. This is just sad of what's happening in our Catholic Church. Apuron should just resign if he hasn't lost his soul completely. David and Adrian too should resign. Bunch of idiots in my opinion. But what would I know, I'm just a typical ordinary.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Subpoena all these conniving crooks and liars! Anyone with a smidgen of decency would simply admit any wrongdoing and take responsibility, come what may. We all have to hold ourselves to certain human standards, otherwise what differentiates us from the animal kingdom? Aside from admitting guilt, any decent individual will try to make restitution by making things right. Enough is enough! How could these buffoons sleep at night or even pontificate in their day jobs? Are these clerics without shame? Oh wait, I think that fact has been established, no need to answer that question. Little boys and girls, the lesson here is that when you lie, you have to cover it up with another lie, then another, until the boys who cried wolf one day wakes up and everything is gone.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There is an old Chamorro saying that it is easier to catch a crook than a lame person. This is a perfect description of the repulsive deception that they tried to spring on the Faithful. I find it reprehensible that these clowns would try to alter the truth. This is deception coming from one who is supposed to be the moral example for the Catholics on Guam. What is even revolting is in spite of Rohr publishing all the documents relating to this theft. SAD, bad example send to the other religions. The Catholic leader knowingly allowed a bogus document to be published in the Umatuna, for the sole purpose of deceiving Catholics that the property has not been transferred. The Archbishop has lost all sense of integrity. Archbishop, one day not in the not too distant future when you loose not only your title, integrity, and respect; you will have time to ponder all that you have done to your people. Kiko in the meantime, will snare other gullible people like you. I do pity you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Attorney Monsignor Liar David C. Quitugua, Neo-Cancer

    Official title

    ReplyDelete
  5. Let's keep all these immoral crooks on the line and in their offices. If they are lost and gone forever it will be most difficult to NAIL them. For sure, for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  6. How could our Chancery be so filled with such corrupt leaders at the top? Liars, thieves, and bad theology.
    Oh, wait. I knew the answer all along. They are the "first fruits" of the neo-carnal way. (especially Adrianna)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Resign, retire or come clean and ask for forgiveness. (Don't see the latter happening) It's time to buy five one way tickets and send the cult packing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Amateur crooks bought into the crookery of the professional crooks. Now unable to extricate themselves from pressure both within and outside.

    ReplyDelete