A MESSAGE BACK TO AB HON was posted on July 19
and received at the Chancery:
Dear Mr. Klitzkie,
Your item was delivered to the front desk or reception area at 10:23 am on July 28, 2016 in HAGATNA, GU 96910
Thank you for choosing YIGO MAIL,
Joe, Liz and Marysa
Let's give AB Hon ten days to reply
and here's Hon's reply.
There's nothing wrong with your computer. Hon sent no response, so here's what it looks like:
_________________________________________________________________________________
and received at the Chancery:
Dear Mr. Klitzkie,
Your item was delivered to the front desk or reception area at 10:23 am on July 28, 2016 in HAGATNA, GU 96910
Thank you for choosing YIGO MAIL,
Joe, Liz and Marysa
Let's give AB Hon ten days to reply
and here's Hon's reply.
There's nothing wrong with your computer. Hon sent no response, so here's what it looks like:
_________________________________________________________________________________
The post included, "So write your notes to Hon in COMMENTS. I can print the post and comments then either email, mail or deliver it all to the Chancery." 85 comments later I'm ready to mail to Hon.
Mary Lou Garcia-Pereda submitted a comment that says it all. To make it easy for the Apostolic Administrator, I'm setting Mary Lou's letter out here. If Hon could abandon the clichés that he seems so fond of, Mary Lou's letter and your posts can show him the way to REAL unity. Here's the letter.
Dear Apostolic Administrator —
I am HONestly intrigued by the idea that you actually think
that, by extending the Archdiocesan Annual Appeal (AAA )
until the end of the calendar year you will be able to raise the goal of
$250,000. If I were you, I HONestly would not hold my breath. Here is a short
“history lesson” regarding the infamous Archdiocesan Annual Appeal — formerly
Catholic Charities Appeal which (in its day) always surpassed its stated goals
— and its recent inability to meet its stated goals …
For your information: Your predecessor Anthony Sablan Apuron
— formerly the “other AAA ” — did
his best to have the Faithful Catholics of the archdiocese pony up funds to
accommodate the living expenses of his NCW wannabe-presbyters at RMS. After a
less than stellar AAA drive in
2013 which only produced $89,240.09 — you can see the graphic in the blog
January 2014 post Archdiocesan Annual
Appeal Update (http://www.junglewatch.info/2014/01/archdiocesan-annual-appeal-update.html) — Apuron
then set the 2014 Required Collection
for the 2014 AAA with the projected goal of $254,152.24. For the
record, there is no way to blame low amount collected during the 2013 AAA on the Removal of Fr. Paul Gofigan in July 2013
— people were already starting to “wise up” and withhold their hard-earned
funds from the AAA .
Several days after the release of the “2014 Required
Collection” it was reported “<i>Upon
receiving the "assessment chart" the other day at the clergy meeting,
one pastor, known for his wisecracking, asked the Archbishop that if he couldn't meet the required amount,
should he take out a loan. The Archbishop
answered: "Yes". And he wasn't joking.” (http://www.junglewatch.info/2014/01/he-wasnt-joking.html)
In early March 2014, in anticipation of the beginning of
that year’s AAA , the 2 March 2014
edition of the U Matuna Si Yu’os
published an ad for the AAA
disguised as series of questions and answers about the AAA .
JungleWatch provided an analysis of the ad (http://www.junglewatch.info/2014/03/appealing-appeal-and-missing-zeroes.html#more), making
it abundantly clear that the majority of the funds raised were earmarked for
the RMS.
Toward the latter part of March 2014 the blog published A Request to the Archdiocese of Agana for
Financial Accountability (http://www.junglewatch.info/2014/03/a-request-to-archdiocese-of-agana-for.html) based on
a letter written to Anthony Sablan Apuron in his role as the “other AAA .” In it, the author whose name was redacted for
the post, expressed concerns regarding the AAA
ad from the U Matuna Si Yu’os
mentioned in the earlier paragraph. The author had sent the letter to then-blog
Administrator Tim Rohr in early March. Rohr did not publish the letter until
after the 21 March deadline set by the letter’s author for Apuron to respond
had passed.
Two months later the 20 June post It’s Time for Financial Transparency (http://www.junglewatch.info/2014/06/it-is-time-for-financial-transparency.html)
revealed that by 8 June, Pentecost Sunday 2014, the AAA
had only reached 42% of the goal set by Apuron. Two days later the 22 June post
Archdiocesan Annual Appeal (http://www.junglewatch.info/2014/06/archdiocesan-annual-appeal.html) revealed
that “Only Asan & Yigo meet the
goal.” and that a total of $106,953.91 had been collected.
In early July 2014 there appeared a Notice in Today’s Pacific Daily News which read “NOTICE to the Most Reverend Anthony Sablan
Apuron, O.F.M.Cap., D.D. Metropolitan Archbishop of Agana Today, almost all
U.S. dioceses publish an annual financial report on their respective websites. IT IS TIME FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF AGANA TO
DO THE SAME. Thus, we, the Concerned Catholics of Guam, hereby
require the above noticed Archbishop, to publish annually, beginning with the
fiscal year completed on June 30, 2012 , an INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT of the
Archdiocese of Agana with the following statements:
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION: detailing assets,
liabilities and net assets
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES: detailing revenue and expenses
STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS
www.ConcernedCatholicsOfGuam.com” (http://www.junglewatch.info/2014/07/notice-in-todays-pacific-daily-news.html)
For the record, that was the very first time the group
“Concerned Catholics of Guam” entered the conversation. Nobody knew who they
were. All we knew was that there was a group demanding FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY
from your predecessor.
Of course within 23 days after that ad appeared Monsignor
James Benavente was removed from the Cathedral Basilica amid allegations of
financial mismanagement.
Apostolic Administrator, you came on the scene in January
2015 as one of three Visitators tasked with identifying what was ailing this
archdiocese. Based on the fact that the majority of individuals who were able
to meet with you and your team were NCW members, you must have heard that all
was well and good in the archdiocese, that only a handful of folks in “the
jungle” were unhappy with Anthony Sablan Apuron. You left the island giving
Apuron the task of healing and reconciliation.
The 2015 AAA
continued with dismal results as documented in the mid-June 2015 post The Charade Continues (http://www.junglewatch.info/2015/06/the-charade-continues.html) which
noted that a total of $79,834 had been collected with another $20,190 “pledged”
as well as the fact that “Pentecost Sunday, the
official "end" of the Appeal was May 24” but the collections
continued.
So here we are in July 2016 with Apuron still on record as the
Archbishop and you are here as Apostolic Administrator. One would think that
after the committees that you have formed … after all the meetings you have
convened … all the song and dance about Serenity,
Harmony and Unity … you would
have finally realized that the Faithful Catholics of Guam are HONestly SICK AND
TIRED of the AAA and WE’RE NOT DROPPING A SINGLE PENNY into
your outstretched hand.
But Nooooooo — what do you do??? You extend the AAA
to the <b>end of the year</b> as though that will make a
difference. And what are you going to do when you still come up short? Are you
going to start the 2017 AAA on 1
January 2017?
How about if you:
• REACH OUT to the Sex Abuse
Survivors of your predecessor Apuron, providing the support and means of
healing that have been denied to them …
• RESTORE Fr. Paul Gofigan
and Monsignor James Benavente to their respective positions as pastors …
• RETURN the Redemptoris
Mater Seminary to the patrimony of the Archdiocese of Agana as well as ensure
that the facility meets the standards of seminaries worldwide and is not just a
factory for malformed presbyters …
• REMOVE the possibility of
having Anthony Sablan Apuron return as archbishop …
• RESPOND to the March 2014 and
July 2014 requests for Financial Transparency with INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
— not a repeat of the song and dance that Deacon Kim tried to do for Nuncio
Martin Krebs during his July 2014 visit, not a smoke and mirrors performance by
the “trained Lawyer” …
If you ACT on the above mentioned items — and other instead of issuing
your weekly messages with veiled implications that Anthony Sablan Apuron will
be returning, you will see how readily the Catholic Faithful will respond to
the AAA ßIF the money will support the AUTHENTIC FORMATION of young men like
Aaron Quitugua and others at REAL
(Non-NCW) Seminaries.
We are a generous people but we will keep our wallets closed as long as
your continue to demonstrate your unwavering support for all things associated
with the NeoCatechumenal Way .
Respectfully,
Might I add, Hon needs to say something about the NCW. Does he support them? Does he see a need for reform? Does he agree that their liturgies are illicit? Is he happy with their structure; with their (secret) catechesis; with their handing of money?
ReplyDeleteThe bigger question, is Hon walking in the Way? All indications seem to suggest that he is more than sympathetic to the NCW.
DeleteMary Lou - Fantastic synopsis of the fiasco of the Annual Archdiocesan Appeal. Every aficionado following this story should bookmark this site (hopefully containing future comments to follow). I can see that a lot of research went into your writing, as you were quoting dates, amounts, and informational sources (and sites) not at random, but methodically. KUDOS and THANK YOU.
ReplyDeleteI, too, had sent a couple of suggestions as to what AB Hon could do to demonstrate and prove that he is doing something productive. I sent my writing to him via email to the Chancery Secretary (Lisa) to forward to AB Hon, as I do not have Hon's email address. My score of replies received: "0 to 10"! BTW, why doesn't Hon give us his email address? Is he such a big-shot? We even have our Papal Nuncio's email address; why not Hon's? Then we can communicate DIRECTLY to him! Bob Klitzkie's suggestion to compile comments made to Hon on JW to forward same to Hon is another fantastic idea! Thanks, Bob! This way, we know that when we write to him, or about him, in JW, we know that Hon will be reading it!
How can we more effectively get the word out to our people to STOP THE MONEY (NA-PARA I SALAPE). If the people will only effectively STOP THE MONEY, we certainly will starve out the beast!
Good job, Mary Lou. Proud of you. (jrsa: 7/26/16)
The letter was mailed, certified return receipt requested, at 1330. I'll post Hon's response. Don't hold your breath though.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the history of the AAA, Mary Lou! Maybe Apostolic Administrator Hon will now believe that the shortfall for the appeal is with merit, after all, and definitely from a lack of will of the faithful. It isn't just about Apuron.
ReplyDeletePost this letter in the Guam PDN voice of the people.
ReplyDeleteMary Lou's letter would make a great Op/Ed wouldn't it.
DeleteThank you, Anonymous at 7:01 PM and Bob at 5:58 AM — I will "tweak" the text because PDN's policy indicates that "Letters must be previously unpublished, including on the internet" PLUS my letter far exceeds the 300 or fewer words for letters and/or 550 or fewer words for an Op/Ed column.
DeleteGood, Mary Lou. Letters like yours are essential to the dissemination of the truth.
DeleteMary Lou excellent letter to Hon. I see he has some legal issues to address..LOL
ReplyDeleteDear Mr. Klitzkie,
ReplyDeleteYour item was delivered to the front desk or reception area at 10:23 am on July 28, 2016 in HAGATNA, GU 96910
Thank you for choosing YIGO MAIL,
Joe, Liz and Marysa
Let's give AB Hon until 8 August to respond.
Dear Mr. Klitzkie,
ReplyDeleteYour item was delivered to the front desk or reception area at 10:23 am on July 28, 2016 in HAGATNA, GU 96910
Thank you for choosing YIGO MAIL,
Joe, Liz and Marysa
Let's give AB Hon ten days to reply