Speaking of "gifts," the chancery has given us a tremendous gift in their headline story (again) about the ownership of the seminary. And when I get done with them, they won't be worth throwing in the trash. I'm serious. Every lie from these liars begets a new and ever more grotesque and abusive lie.
I'm a bit distracted right now, tending to the wedding of my daughter and a little R & R with the fam, but that's okay. It will be fun letting these people rot in their lies because they know what's coming and I'm not even talking about 1977. That's a separate issue.
Let's start with this one just for fun.
No doubt that this was put out by the arch-villain David the VG. If I were him I wouldn't continue to demonstrate my stupidity, but since he insists...I'll help him. David the Villain attempts to bowl us over with this:
Bishop Arieta of the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts (the highest judicial authority in the Roman Curia) who serves in the name of the Pope.
LOL. Like serving "in the name of the pope" meant a damn thing to Apuron when in 2005, Cardinal Arinze, Prefect for the Congregation of Divine Worship and Sacraments told his silly cult to shut down their illicit communion rite. Apuron famously went on the air and called Arinze's credentials into question, even though Arinze's instruction began with the words "I am to inform you of the Holy Father’s decisions." (Here is the audio of Apuron's comments and here is the transcript.)
But let's get to the meat.
David the Villain calls the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts: "the highest judicial authority in the Roman Curia." LOL. And he's the Vicar General? If there's anything a guy with a degree in canon law should know he should at least know which Curial body is the "highest judicial authority." But David the VG once again demonstrates why it took him more than a decade to get one.
The "highest judicial authority in the Roman Curia" is NOT the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts, it is THE SUPREME TRIBUNAL OF THE APOSTOLIC SIGNATURA.
Google it, David. Seriously, you're a joke.
I agree Tim, David is a huge joke. It's why I stopped attending his morning masses. Cause he was to busy preaching about why anyone should question the archbishop and that the church is not a democracy for debate but that it's a hierarchy. What a slap in the face to bring politics into a sermon. But I guess he needs to score a lot of brownie points to secure that he becomes the next archbishop.
ReplyDeleteFor a long while, the rebuttals of the Neo lies spread by apuron and his ilk have been limited to the Jungle Watch Blog with its relatively limited readership. And Neo defenders have taken to using the Umatuna and the mainstream media to spread their lies among the unsuspecting general public. Now, with the latest lie about the Yona property/RMS seminary in the spotlight of the PDN, I hope that the defenders of the faith, who are certainly more knowledgeable and more articulate than I am, will also take to the mainstream media to make the truth known to the public at large.
ReplyDeleteI would like to add that the articles in the Umatuna Si Yuus and the PDN about the Yona property open the door of opportunity for rebuttals in the mainstream media through letters to the editor, expressing the truth, in detail, about how apuron knowingly deceived the Catholic faithful at least about this property, never mind his other abuses, for now.
ReplyDeleteThank God for JW and for the erudite knowledge of Tim Rohr, otherwise we will be easily bulldozed by the BS of david the VG. Wow, how can this VG be trusted at all? Dies he even know how tedious he has become for the rest of us? He has to be taken out of his misery and the burdens of priesthood. He never was meant to lead but to be an object of people's derision.
ReplyDelete:,,,,,,,,(> GO REST CRY-BABY GO BACK IN YOUR TREE
ReplyDeleteStay out of the jungle, hide at Vivian Way.
DeleteHe qualifies as a Neo--cannot think!
ReplyDeleteEileen Benavente-Blas
More like a Neo-cannot-communicate IMO,.
DeleteDat's a good one @ James 007! Sweet!
DeleteMore like a cadaver sidekick who comes alive in defense of his archapuron.
ReplyDeletefacepalm. i don't know much canon law, but even i knew the correct office is the apostolic signatura.
ReplyDeletejust to play with this a bit. i see two possibilities: either the vicar general really is ignorant of that basic fact, or he knows that fact, but is deliberately misleading people--lying. both are bad.